Monday, July 6, 2015

Jupiter Ascending: A Sci-fi Turret

          If cool concepts and visually stunning effects alone were the stuff that great movies are made of, Jupiter Ascending would have been a smash hit. Unfortunately, a film needs more than that. It needs plot, good acting and character development. More than anything, it needs good writing. Jupiter Ascending has none of those things. The sad truth is, the Wachowski siblings may never make another movie that was as conceptually moving and as well thought out as the Matrix trilogy. And when I come to think of it, I’m the only person I know who thoroughly enjoyed all three Matrix movies.

                                                   

            
         As soon as I found out the main character’s name was Jupiter, I knew I was in for a flop. It had all the telltale signs: the characters were two-dimensional, the lines were spoken as if they were being read off of a teleprompter, and there was nothing particularly redeeming about the main character’s willingness to take abuse and be manipulated at every turn.

It seemed like the Wachowskis were attempting to set us up for some sort of intergalactic Cinderella motif where the prince is the villain. And boy what a villain. His voice was constantly at a whining whisper so that it seemed like he was always about to cry and or make out with the other characters on screen. Not that the other villains were any better, though their underacting didn’t exactly excuse or compensate for the main villain’s overacting. Still, I don’t blame the actors. It’s the director’s responsibility to keep this type of stuff from making it to the final cut, and I’m one-hundred percent sure it was the Wachowskis who saw to it that Eddie Redmayne came across as a hackneyed S&M dungeon master.

I almost want to say that there were gaping plot holes, but there was no plot to speak of, other than that Jupiter was apparently ascending. What I can say is there were glaring inconsistencies in the conceptualization of the alternative reality of the movie. One scene in particular that comes to mind is where a space ship glides through the rings of a planet as though it were a submarine coming to surface. We know that this was in the name of keeping the movie visually stunning, but it was pretty arbitrary considering that the ship had the entire rest of space to choose to move through and that the meteorites that comprise the rings of a planet will destroy pretty much anything in their path. Other issues that were ignored were little things like when and where atmosphere occurs and who is immune to the vacuum of space.

If anything could have saved the film, it might have been the awesome concepts that were thrown around, all of which were dismissed almost as soon as they were introduced. These cool concepts included: youth as a drug, time as a tradable commodity, the farming and harvesting of various humanoid species, an intergalactic monarchy, and a scientific paradigm explaining the concept of reincarnation.  


With the most interesting parts of the movie remaining largely undeveloped, there was never a payoff. If there was any takeaway at all, it was that nobody screws you over quite like family. The film as a whole was like a sci-fi turret and probably would have been better delivered as a trilogy or an HBO series. Unfortunately the Wachowskis prematurely ejaculated their ideas all over the screen and won’t be getting a second chance to bed us down with them in the near future. 

No comments:

Post a Comment